The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to reconsider ITC claims for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21 under Section 16(5), emphasizing compliance with the October 8, 2024 ...
The Tribunal emphasized that an error regarding VRS exemption made by a salaried, non-technical taxpayer cannot be classified as deliberate under-reporting. With no false claim or suppression, the ...
The Gujarat High Court allowed a chemical manufacturer’s refund claim of unutilized ITC under Rule 89, affirming SEZ units can claim refunds even when supplied via ISD. Prior precedent in Britannia ...
Madras High Court permits a delayed appeal against GST penalty order, provided 25% of disputed tax and interest on belated payment are deposited, emphasizing conditional ...
Millions of Americans will need to decide between paying skyrocketing health care premiums or going without coverage in 2026 ...
Tribunal emphasizes requirement of notice under section 153C for assessments in block period, quashing AY 2021-22 assessment framed without ...
The ITAT remanded a case where a charitable society’s 80G(5) registration was rejected because incidental sales were misclassified as business income. The Tribunal emphasized evaluating the society’s ...
Tribunal held that delay in submitting Form 10B is curable, allowing trust to claim income application under Section 11(1)(a) as it was filed prior to completion of assessment ...
Explains how Section 194Q requires buyers with large turnover to deduct TDS on purchases above ₹50 lakh. Key takeaway: The buyer becomes responsible for compliance, ensuring major transactions are ...
ITAT remanded the rejection of 12A registration after finding that incorrect clause selection was a clerical mistake. substantive eligibility and genuine charitable activities outweigh technical ...
ITAT Pune held that the Section 263 revision was unsustainable as the AO conducted adequate scrutiny and expenses were recovered from associated enterprises. Expenditure classification did not make ...
The Tribunal held that amounts paid directly to a confirming party did not accrue to the seller and could not be treated as capital gains. The Section 263 revision was invalidated because the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results