The tribunal dismissed the Section 9 application because the applicant failed to establish valid service of the Section 8 notice. The ruling stresses that insolvency proceedings cannot commence ...
Court held that appeal against a confiscation order was time-barred and refused to condone delay. It ruled that lack of diligence after receiving demand notice barred intervention under Article ...
The Court directed the Pollution Control Board to decide the petitioner’s application within six weeks after noting the pending recommendation. The ruling ensures timely action without addressing ...
The Court held that cotton-filled khadi rajai falls under the taxable category at 14%, rejecting claims of exemption. The ruling confirms that exemption applies only to unfilled ...
The court quashed a GST assessment order after the authority failed to provide a personal hearing, directing a reasoned order in line with natural justice ...
The Court held that the petitioner was not granted a personal hearing before the GST order was issued. The matter was remitted, subject to full tax ...
The Tribunal held that notices under section 153C issued without independent satisfaction by the AO are invalid, quashing the ...
The company failed to comply with statutory charge registration requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, attracting ...
The order holds that the company commenced operations before filing the mandatory INC-20A form, constituting a 293-day delay.
The ROC Chennai penalized a company and its directors for failing to disclose PAN and email IDs of allottees in Form PAS-3.
The company and its officer were penalized for failing to transfer acquired assets into the company’s name, violating Section ...
The case involves alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 read with Section 120B of the IPC, and Sections ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results