The proposal seeks to revoke tariffs of up to 50 per cent imposed on Indian-origin goods under the International Emergency ...
20hon MSN
U.S. could owe businesses $168 billion if Supreme Court rules against Trump tariffs, analysis finds
A ruling striking down emergency levies could force the federal government to return most of the tariff revenue it has ...
The House resolution seeks to terminate President Trump’s national emergency declaration that enabled tariffs of up to 50 per ...
Three US House members have introduced a resolution to cancel President Trump’s emergency-based tariffs on India, arguing the ...
In a significant acknowledgement of India’s growing economic importance to the United States, three members of the US House ...
In the next few months, the United States Supreme Court will decide whether the President of the United States had the authority to impose the ...
Firms mulling similar litigation should “do their homework” and check deadlines for alternative and potentially less costly ...
U.S. Supreme Court justices seemed poised to overturn independent agency heads and let President Trump fire FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter Dec. 8. November 7, 2025 U.S. Supreme Court justices ...
A growing number of companies — following the lead of Costco — are filing protective lawsuits in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ...
The United States can use other measures to recreate the roughly $200 billion in revenues it is collecting under tariffs ...
If the Trump administration wants to use tariffs to fight “persistent” goods trade imbalances, the right statute is Section 122 of the Trade Act, not the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Trump’s allies defend his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping tariffs by insisting that Congress can end the underlying “national emergency.” They argue that if ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results